By Ameen Izzdeen
Peace scientists and world elders gathered in Washington DC on Thursday to announce how perilously close we are to a global disaster. They revealed the new reading on the Doomsday Clock at 8.30 pm Sri Lanka time yesterday. The symbolic clock is now only 100 seconds away from midnight. For the past two years, the reading on the clock maintained by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists had remained at two minutes to midnight or apocalypse.
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) said on Thursday that the change was made due to nuclear proliferation, failure to tackle climate change and “cyber-based disinformation”.
The fact that the clock had not been revised anti-clockwise, since the Cold War ended in 1991, underscores the indifference of most world leaders with regard to the coming catastrophe. They continue to smoke cigars at the petrol bunk, without paying heed to the no-smoking sign. The clock’s reading was seven minutes to midnight when it was set up, 17 minutes to midnight when the cold war ended in 1991, five minutes to midnight in 2012, three minutes to midnight in 2015 and 2016 and two and a half minutes to midnight in 2017 – a digressive path.
Though initially the clock’s time was set largely on the basis of the threat of a nuclear war, today it is set taking into consideration not only wars and conflicts but also threats to human existence through climate change and disturbing or destructive technological innovation, especially weapons development.
The Doomsday Clock was set up in 1947 by some of the very scientists involved in the making of the first atomic bombs – the cruellest weapon mankind had ever seen. They formed the Bulletin a year after the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The clock warns us about how close we are to destroying our world with dangerous technologies of our own making. It is a metaphor and a reminder of the perils we must address if we are to survive on the planet.
In 2004, the devastating tsunami came without a warning and killed some 30,000 people in Sri Lanka and hundreds of thousands in Indonesia and elsewhere. But since then, countries have adopted systems to warn and evacuate people at the first sign of a tsunami following an earthquake beneath the sea. This similitude should apply to the nuclear holocaust. The world saw how terrible nuclear weapons were when elementary atomic bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. Therefore, we should take every measure to stop nuclear bombs being used to settle disputes between states. This is more so because today’s nuclear bombs are a thousand times more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The danger is closer than ever before, with a maverick president at the helm of affairs in the United States – the world’s most powerful nuclear state, where the president is permitted to order a nuclear attack. In terms of this policy, President Donald Trump can act alone and issue the order for a nuclear strike, even if the US was not under an imminent threat of a nuclear attack from a hostile nation. Two weeks ago, the world saw how immature, irresponsible and dangerous Trump was, as he almost set the whole of Middle East on fire by killing a top Iranian general in a targeted assassination.
This prompted Congress members to call for moves to curtail the presidential power to declare war. The danger of Trump triggering a nuclear confrontation is a major concern among Democratic Party candidates at the 2020 primaries. Some candidates and Congress members call for a return to the no-first-use policy.
Since Trump came into office in January 2017, the clock’s minute hand tends to get closer to 12 due to his action. By mishandling the North Korean issue, he provoked the reclusive state to speed up its nuclear weapons programme and beef up its arsenal with more powerful warheads and missiles. True, Trump started talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, but in hindsight, it appears these talks were largely ego-massaging opportunities for Trump rather than any genuine effort to denuclearise the Korean peninsula.
What’s more, he withdrew last year from the Cold War era Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) agreement, instead of pushing for a stronger disarmament instrument with Moscow. The dispute has now triggered an arms race, which does not augur well for world peace or measures aimed at meeting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
On the climate front, too, Trump has become a fanatical infidel, refusing to believe that the world is fast hurtling into an irreversible climate catastrophe.
This week in Davos, addressing the World Economic Forum, Trump took a swipe at climate activists, calling them fear mongers and foolish fortune tellers, the likes of whom, in the past, had warned of an overpopulation crisis in the 1960s, a mass starvation in the 70s, and an end of oil in the 1990s.
With leaders like Trump at the helm of world affairs, nuclear disarmament may appear a distant dream – all the more reason why we should redouble our efforts to bring a nuclear-weapons-free world. In this despondent situation, Pope Francis appears as a hope as he carries out a determined campaign for global nuclear disarmament. Last year, during a visit to Japan, the only country that was hit by atomic bombs, the pontiff condemned nuclear weapons and the growing arms trade. He said the money spent on weapons should be used to eradicate poverty and protect the environment.
Sri Lanka ardently campaigned for the 1971 UN resolution on the Indian Ocean Zone of Peace as part of its commitment to nuclear disarmament. However, the 30-year civil war the country was grappling with sapped much of its energy while its poor human rights record during the war years denied it the moral upper hand to be a global peacemaker.
But this does not justify Sri Lanka’s failure to sign or ratify key international nuclear weapon treaties. It was heartening to note that on Tuesday, the Forum on Disarmament and Development, a Sri Lankan peace advocate body, held a ceremony to launch three trilingual publications on why Sri Lanka should ratify the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty of (CTBT) it had signed and sign and ratify the 2017 Nuclear Ban Treaty, which it supported at the UN General Assembly.
The government should pay heed to the FDD’s call and ratify the major nuclear agreements and let the world know that Sri Lanka stands for nuclear disarmament. Even more so because Sri Lanka now finds itself in a nuclear weapons zone, with fighting neighbours India and Pakistan being nuclear powers while nuclear submarines of big powers are regularly spotted in the Indian Ocean.
(An early version of this article appeared in the Daily Mirror, Sri Lanka)
-
Recent Posts
- What Netanyahu is trying to achieve by provoking Iran
- Attack on Iran: Amid lies and deception, Gaza war may escalate into a regional conflict
- Gaza genocide, ISIS and the tailpiece of Moscow terror
- Rachel Corrie and USS Liberty: The Hannibal Doctrine in US diplomacy
- Gaza famine: Food aid before the slaughter
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
Categories
Meta