By Ameen Izzadeen
When the eight leaders of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) met in Kathmandu, Nepal on Wednesday, the undercurrent was one of one-upmanship and the atmosphere underscored the truism that there is no altruism in politics.
In sharp contrast to the mood of solidarity that prevailed at the inauguration of India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi in May this year, with all SAARC country leaders or their representatives present, the air at the summit venue in Kathmandu was heavy with sparring and shadow boxing. So much so that some even wrote off the summit as a flop even before it ended today.
It is mutiny on board. Sri Lanka’s former President J.R. Jayewardene’s warning, perhaps, has come true.
Addressing the inaugural SAARC summit in 1985 in Dhaka, he said: “We are setting this ship afloat today. There may be mutiny on board, I hope not.”
This week’s mutiny on the SAARC ship was a direct result of the souring of relations between South Asian nuclear rivals, India and Pakistan. In recent months, the two countries have been exchanging fire across a ceasefire line that divides the disputed territory of Kashmir. Pakistan refused to endorse India’s proposals for regional connectivity and a common power grid, while, much to India’s chagrin, there were also moves by Pakistan to bring in China as a full member or a special status observer state.
Shaken by Pakistan’s refusal to sign the deals, Modi — in a clear message to his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif, who was sharing the head table with him at the Kathmandu summit — said the countries in the region would deepen bonds, “through SAARC or outside it, among us all or some of us.”
Pakistan said it could not agree to the road and rail connectivity agreements proposed by India because his country’s internal processes were incomplete. Pakistan agreed to the power grid pact after a Sharif-Modi handshake yesterday at the retreat.
Who said SAARC was about regionalism? It is more about realpolitik aimed at promoting one’s national interest. SAARC was born out of fears and worries that South Asia’s small countries had over India’s geopolitical ambitions in the Indian Ocean region. They managed to tie India up with the concept of regional cooperation. India was not unaware of this move but it saw a greater benefit by being in SAARC. As India had envisaged, SAARC became a forum dominated by India a mere few years after its inception.
The move to promote China’s entry as a full member is an attempt to change the India-centric outlook of SAARC. Pakistan fully supports the move. Of course, Sri Lanka will not say no to China’s membership in SAARC, given the special relationship the two countries enjoy especially under the present government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
It was not for nothing that the Asia Pacific Daily, published by the Xinhua news agency’s Kathmandu bureau, brought out a 12-page special edition for this week’s SAARC Summit. At least three Nepali cabinet ministers and two former foreign ministers supported Beijing’s call for full membership.
Thus Nepal which has been receiving millions of dollars in Chinese aid for development work is not averse to China’s membership.
With Afghanistan, the Maldives and Bangladesh noncommittal, opposition to Beijing’s entry comes from only India and Bhutan. India opposes it because of fears that it will lose its primus inter pares position while Bhutan, a satellite state of India, does not maintain diplomatic relations with China because of a territorial dispute. However, for China to enter SAARC, the consensus of all member states is required. Thus the question of China’s full membership may be on hold, but Beijing will keep on knocking at the SAARC door until all members agree to open it. If India can work with China within BRICS and become a partner in the new China-led Asian Investment and Infrastructure Bank, there is no reason other than India’s ambitions to play the role of South Asia’s policeman for it to oppose China’s membership.
“We value the role played by SAARC and stand ready to elevate our partnership with it so that together we can play a greater role and contribute constructively to the region,” said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Hua Chunying, this week before deputy foreign minister Liu Zhen left for the Kathmandu Summit. China says it is ready to spend US$ 30 billion on infrastructure projects in South Asia.
Questions may be asked whether China is a South Asian country. Geography is not a key factor that decides regional cooperation. Even if it is so, China can claim that it shares a common border with five SAARC nations – Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan.
Beijing backers also argue that SAARC could benefit from China’s economic growth and the grouping could extend its trade links to Central Asia and the Asia Pacific region via China. Also if China is given full membership, the Indo-Pakistan issues that stymie SAARC’s growth can be overlooked and the South Asian group could make progress.
Some 29 years after the first summit in Dhaka, SAARC has not seen much progress in the key area of economic cooperation. Even eight years after the South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) entered into force, trade among member states amounts to a pathetic five per cent.
Raising the living standards of its teeming millions living in abject poverty is the key goal of SAARC, but the grouping cannot claim with a sense of pride that South Asia is somewhat better off today than what it was in 1985 because of SAARC.
Areas of cooperation are many, but few real benefits have trickled down to the grassroots level or made an impact on the day-to-day life of South Asia’s 1.8 billion people, for whom this week’s SAARC summit is a non-event. Until they saw on TV screens their leaders addressing the summit, they did not know that there was a summit in Kathmandu. The hope and faith the South Asian people had in SAARC in the initial years are unheard of today.
With a SAARC identity or South Asian solidarity being largely part of political rhetoric, SAARC’s role has been greatly diminished and the annual summits are just a platform for talks between its leaders.
The bottom line is that after 29 years, SAARC is nowhere close any regional integration. Let’s not make any comparison between SAARC and EU, ASEAN or even Mercosur, the Latin America’s success story.
(This article first appeared in the Daily Mirror, Sri Lanka on November 28, 2014)
-
Recent Posts
- What Netanyahu is trying to achieve by provoking Iran
- Attack on Iran: Amid lies and deception, Gaza war may escalate into a regional conflict
- Gaza genocide, ISIS and the tailpiece of Moscow terror
- Rachel Corrie and USS Liberty: The Hannibal Doctrine in US diplomacy
- Gaza famine: Food aid before the slaughter
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
Categories
Meta